Picture of Barack Obama, Tony Rezko (now being tried for political corruption and bribery), and the mock Georgian Mansion that Rezko helped his political protege Obama purchase.
I hope you'll take a look at the previous column (scroll down) regarding my home state, Pennsylvania, and its role in determining who will be the next President of the United States. I will do a lot more on Pennsylvania as we move toward the state's primary on April 22, a contest that Hillary Rodham Clinton should win handily.
I wrote about Pennsylvania's governor, one Edward Rendell, a politician so devious and corrupt that he would be right at home in Barack Obama's Chicago. Every day I learn more about Windy City politics by reading the superb Chicago Tribune reporter John Kass, who may be the world's leading expert on corruption in his city.
Two pieces by Kass that I highly recommend are his Sunday column (March 2) entitled "GOP is Caught Looking as the Rezko Trial Begins," which you can find at: http://chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/chi-kass-rezko-trial-blago-column,1,6062021.column. Kass points out how Republicans in Illlinois have learned well from their Democratic counterparts when it comes to corruption.
Also take a look at Kass's column today (March 6) about what he calls "The Chicago Way," which refers to the city's politicians perpetually having their hands out for bribes. Regarding Senator Obama, who probably should have kept his hands in his pockets when it came to political fixer Tony Rezko, Kass says:
"Naturally, there are some squares who don't think taxpayers should pave the Chicago Way to make it easy for Rezko to help purchase the senator's dream house in a kinky deal exposed by the Tribune and still not fully explained."
"'It's really the Old Chicago Way,'" said Jay Stewart, executive director of the Better Government Association. 'In the old days they would pretty much admit it up front, and now they deny it. It's essentially about power, access to government jobs, government contracts and taking care of your own.'"
You can see the entire article at: http://chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/chi-john-kass-mar06,1,4070424.column.
In my previous column, I mentioned that Governor Ed Rendell of Pennsylvania also has a corruption problem. In The Almanac of American Politics, Michael Barone notes (p. 1378) that, in 2006, "Rendell spent $740,000 (out of a total campaign expenditure of $42 million) on Election Day activities, including $450,000 cash to be handed out in [Philadelphia's] 66 wards."
I'm sure you're shocked (or not?). In other words, Rendell basically handed out bribe money to make sure he won my huge majorities in Philadelphia. But isn't that illegal? Apparently, it's not in Pennsylvania (or, for that matter, Illinois). I'm not certain how much money Rendell passed to political fixers in Pittsburgh, but I'm sure it was a tidy sum.
Rendell is a former Mayor of Philadelphia, and in his first campaign he ran as the architect of something called "The Philadelphia Miracle." In fact, Philadelphia is a "leader" among American cities in homicides and overall crime per capita, as well as in unemployment and overall misery. Its educational system is among the worst in the nation.
Apparently, the Philadelphia Miracle is the fact that the city, under Rendell's leadership, didn't fall into the Atlantic Ocean.
In many ways, Chicagoan Barack Obama should feel right at home here in the Keystone State. However, Rendell favors Hillary Clinton, and what Rendell wants he generally gets. When it comes to generating political results, Gov. Rendell pays top dollar.
Much more about PA to follow . . .
2 comments:
I'm 47 years old. I've been registered as a Republican since I was 18, and voted pretty much party line my whole life.
If you want me to vote for McCain, convince me of just one thing.
Convince me he isn't corrupt.
I know Hillary is. I know Obama is. The problem is, I'm pretty sure McCain is, too.
It's not money, these days. He got caught with Keating, and I believe him when he says he doesn't sell out for money anymore. If he did, he would have sold out to Boeing and we'd have kept the Tankers in the US. Instead, he sells out for headlines.
Why else would he have said Hillary would make a fine president? Why else would he have gone before the Democrat national convention, and told them how great they were, and how screwed up his own party was?
Why else did he flirt with changing parties, and running with Kerry?
If I thought he was principled, and simply disagreed with me on policy, I'd vote for him. I don't think he is. I think he chews up his friends, and bends over for his opponents, because he's in love with his own image. He wants the NY Times endorsement more than he wants to do what's right.
I hope I'm wrong. I hope he can convince me I'm wrong. If he can't, I'm sitting this one out, and I'll hate doing it. But I know, deep in my heart, that he's not going to make it till May without kicking the GOP in the teeth again.
Senator McCain has answered all the questions you have raised. He has written two books. Have you read them? If you really have this much trouble distinguishing McCain (with an 82.3% American Conservative Union record) against Obama and Clinton, who have ACU records of 8 and 0, then you have problems that I can't solve. I suggest you vote for Obama. McCain never spoke to the national Democratic convention. John Kerry did ask him to be his running mate, and McCain said no. Again, I don't think McCain wants people as misinformed as you are to vote for him. John McCain, like his father and his grandfather, is an American hero. Obama is not, Clinton is not, and neither are you. If you want to make further comments, you're welcome, but please give your name and location. I certainly do.
steve maloney
ambridge, pa
Post a Comment